Good Areas

Good Areas

Share this post

Good Areas
Good Areas
Nitish Reddy: The problem and solution
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
User's avatar
Discover more from Good Areas
In cricket's footmarks.
Over 7,000 subscribers
Already have an account? Sign in

Nitish Reddy: The problem and solution

Jarrod Kimber's avatar
Jarrod Kimber
Dec 28, 2024

Share this post

Good Areas
Good Areas
Nitish Reddy: The problem and solution
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Share

Check out Best of Cricket for the latest cricket stories

Subscribe

Nitish Reddy: The problem and solution

The second ball Nitish Kumar Reddy faced, Australia had already made a change. They were well on top, and were more worried about any weather on the drop-in pitch making it hard to get the remaining 14 wickets. But when the young Indian number eight came in, they made a change. 

Scott Boland was bowling, and he had three wickets already, and was at his MCG. Yet, Alex Carey came up to the stumps. 

They know that while Boland has a psychological hold on the rest of the Indian batters, Nitish just wanders down the wicket and ruins his length. Despite the fact that Australia were ahead and that Boland gets a lot of caught behinds, Carey comes up to the stumps, making his catches far less likely. Nitish was in their heads, before he made a run. 

But while he has caused problems for Australia, he has done the same for India. He’s a lower order player who really hasn’t shown much with the ball. He made his debut playing as the fourth seamer and batting at number eight. 

Him making runs actually caused India issues with their selection. In some ways Reddy has been the problem, in others, the solution. 

India were in trouble when Nitish faced his first ball in Tests. They were 73/6, and after everything that had proceeded against New Zealand, it felt like all hope was lost. He more than doubled their score from there, and his 41 didn’t seem that important at that moment. When Australia were all out, his innings looked like the best knock of the entire first innings. In the second he added another 38*, with plenty of hitting in it as well. 

The issue was that he only bowled seven overs, getting the one lucky wicket through a Mitchell Marsh drag-on. It was clear his bowling was little more than handy, so he created the Ashton Agar Conundrum. 

In the 2013 Ashes, Australia weirdly decided to drop Nathan Lyon for the debutant Ashton Agar. It was a weird call, as Lyon had taken a bag against India in the previous match. Agar batted at number 11, and went on to break the world record in that position. He struck the ball so purely, and almost never stopped smiling which ended on the front page of the UK newspapers. 

But he didn’t bowl well, even if Stuart Broad made it look worse than it was. It would have made perfect sense for Australia to drop him and bring back Lyon. But how do you do that for a guy who scored 98 and could be a great number eight—perhaps even moonlight at seven?

Agar took no wickets and scored barely any runs in the following match. Australia were two nil down. 

Australia took a huge swing on Agar because they loved his upside. He was a great athlete who could bowl, bat and field. When he made runs, they just had to keep him in the side. But he was not the spinner for English wickets, and as a prospect, he never panned out. 

Teams take huge swings on allrounders. But how they develop is usually more of a mystery compared to a specialist. Being good at two things means you spend less time working on each, and if you’re a younger player, you are also in development. Nitish Reddy is a really exciting player. But he's probably going to end up being very different from what he started as—a bowler who was a handy number eight.

We know that because he was already a number seven by the second Test. Part of this was trying to fit R Ashwin in the side, but like Agar, he’d been promoted for the runs he made in the first Test. Unlike Agar, he made them again. 

Coming in to bat at 87/5, he took them to 180, with another score in the 40s. Again, India failed in the first innings. He looked very good, dragging them to a respectable score. But this time, it was not really enough. 

He did chip in with another wicket, but again it was a poor ball. At that stage, Australia were trailing by only 12 runs, with six wickets in hand.

In the second innings, India collapsed again, and you will not believe this, but Nitish made another 40-odd. His scores in Tests were now 41, 38, 42 and 42. He’d either created a glass ceiling for himself, or he truly believed that the number 42 was the meaning of life. 

Nitish Reddy: The problem and solution

But India could not drop him now. 

Download Hitwicket Cricket Game 2024


Subscribe to Good Areas

Hundreds of paid subscribers
In cricket's footmarks.

Share this post

Good Areas
Good Areas
Nitish Reddy: The problem and solution
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Share

Discussion about this post

User's avatar
How two new balls changed ODI cricket
In October 2011, cricket changed how many new balls it uses in ODI cricket. So we looked into what actually changed.
Sep 14, 2023 â€¢ 
Jarrod Kimber
7

Share this post

Good Areas
Good Areas
How two new balls changed ODI cricket
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Virat Kohli was flawless
Batsmen make errors, but for this knock, Kohli was at war with mistakes.
Feb 9, 2021 â€¢ 
Jarrod Kimber
15

Share this post

Good Areas
Good Areas
Virat Kohli was flawless
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
6
The bias against spinning pitches
A look at many of the reasons that we react as we do when a pitch spins on day one.
Feb 14, 2021 â€¢ 
Jarrod Kimber
21

Share this post

Good Areas
Good Areas
The bias against spinning pitches
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
16

Ready for more?

© 2025 Jarrod Kimber
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Create your profile

User's avatar

Only paid subscribers can comment on this post

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

Check your email

For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.

Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.