Good Areas

Good Areas

Share this post

Good Areas
Good Areas
England clock runs per over on day one
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
User's avatar
Discover more from Good Areas
In cricket's footmarks.
Over 7,000 subscribers
Already have an account? Sign in

England clock runs per over on day one

Pakistan are also involved.

Jarrod Kimber's avatar
Jarrod Kimber
Dec 01, 2022
3

Share this post

Good Areas
Good Areas
England clock runs per over on day one
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Share

Buy me a drink

638 times a team has made over 500 in a Test.

And most of them are near each other in terms of runs per over. After the 1950s, Test batting rates never really changed that much. Occasionally someone would bat faster in an innings, but even as the bats got bigger, and the batters got stronger, things did not change that much. And then you have this last innings by England -which is in any and every way a complete outlier in the history of cricket.

Test runs per over was not trending this way at all. Then England did this.

England had 13 leaves today. Australia had 158 yesterday. Intent has become a dirty buzzword in cricket of recent times. It used to be called attacking cricket.

Twitter avatar for @cricvizanalyst
The CricViz Analyst @cricvizanalyst
England have attacked 64% of the balls they’ve faced today - this is the highest attacking shot percentage in a Test innings since records begun (2006). The previous record was 54%. For context: since 2015 England have attacked 49% of balls faced in ODIs & 65% in T20s. #PAKvENG
11:21 AM ∙ Dec 1, 2022
338Likes64Retweets

England went well beyond intent or attacking. This was one of the most aggressive days - if not the most - ever we have seen in Test cricket. Because other than a leave on ball one, England went at Pakistan from beginning to end. This was even more aggressive than anything we have seen in the Bazball era.

Twitter avatar for @fwildecricket
Freddie Wilde @fwildecricket
What we’ve seen in Rawalpindi is the coming together of a flat pitch (although the data doesn’t think unusually so; there’s inconsistent bounce) & a subpar Pakistan attack but most significantly England have played with attacking intent never seen before in Test cricket. #PAKvENG
Twitter avatar for @cricvizanalyst
The CricViz Analyst @cricvizanalyst
England have attacked 64% of the balls they’ve faced today - this is the highest attacking shot percentage in a Test innings since records begun (2006). The previous record was 54%. For context: since 2015 England have attacked 49% of balls faced in ODIs & 65% in T20s. #PAKvENG
11:25 AM ∙ Dec 1, 2022
174Likes28Retweets

Now, there were some big hairy caveats out there. After Babar Azam said he thought this would be a better pitch than when Australia toured, on day one alone, it would appear to be as flat as a wicket can be. It felt like if you fired a ballistic warhead at this pitch at the other end, you’d get a cup of coffee with a cooked breakfast.

So it was a flat pitch, sure. We have seen them before, and this still our first 500 runs on day one. So what else helped? Well Pakistan picked an incredibly untested attack.

Twitter avatar for @cricketingview
cricketingview @cricketingview
PAK's XI today is their least experience Test XI on the bowling side since 1954. They've had a less experienced Test bowling line up in only 5 of their 445 Tests (in which they bowled) before today.
Image
Twitter avatar for @ovshake42
Abhishek Mukherjee @ovshake42
Test wickets: 33 Naseem Shah 2 Zahid Mahmood 1 Agha Salman 1 Haris Rauf * 37 Total for Pakistan * 47 Joe Root
11:02 AM ∙ Dec 1, 2022
25Likes8Retweets

If they thought the wicket would have something in it, this still would have been a risk. But on this surface, they were thrown in there and looked out of ideas. The seamers never went for cutters, 8-1 fields or low arm balls. Not sure any of that would have worked, but somewhere around the 400 runs just after tea, I reckon you have try it.

England clearly decided to sweep a lot, yet it took forever for the Pakistan spinners to slow the ball down. By then England had swept 16% of the balls bowled to them. Almost four times what you would normally seen.

Pakistan were also a bit weird with their fields.

Twitter avatar for @OptaJim
OptaJim @OptaJim
100 - Harry Brook has scored the third fastest men's Test hundred by an @englandcricket player (80 balls), behind the record held by Gilbert Jessop (76 balls v Australia, 1902) and @jbairstow21 (77 balls v NZ, 2022). Quickfire.
Image
Image
11:36 AM ∙ Dec 1, 2022
9Likes4Retweets

Like here is Harry Brook’s wagon wheel.

He kinda kept hitting his boundaries at two parts of the ground. I feel like on a day like this, just having someone on that boundary all the time is ok. Ofcourse a few of these were off a low-use part-timer who might have already bowled his last over in Test cricket.

But, even when you weigh up the pitch, the bowlers and some of the fielding decisions, this was beszerk from England. There are no caveats I can give you that explain away how England suddenly scored a run an over quicker than any team with 400 runs in a Test.

When they started quick, I understood that. Australia would often score very fast in the first session with players like Michael Slater, Justin Langer and Matt Hayden up top. But they would pull back. In fact often they wouldn’t score that many runs in a day. They psychological damage was done. They were still considered a fast scoring team.

These are all the innings where Australia made over 400 runs during their run from 95-2010 and England today. They only scored over five runs an over once in that period. This isn’t like what Australia did; this is unlike anything we have seen.

England don’t stop. Even when they are accumulating, it is in the style of their ODI play. There is no rest, no boring middle overs, and no downtime if you are a bowler. And so what they are capable of is run rates around six and seven. No one else is touching that.

What I found more interesting was tactics partly inspired this. England know this is probably a four-day Test due to the light conditions, and there was no real reason to pull back. But to continually hit this well for a whole day, well, it just doesn’t happen. And they still have a few more hits in them.

There have been 1586 scores over 400 in Test cricket. 1573 of them were scored at five runs an over or slower. One was scored at over a run a ball. It’s just remarkable what we are seeing right now.

We know enough about Bazball now to understand that it probably works better when the ball or pitch isn’t helping. That is easy to understand. But what England are doing when it does is still something our game hasn’t seen.

We are seeing the weirdest flare-up that will crash spectacularly or a new way of playing our sport. And the good news is, both of those things are fun.

Buy me a drink

Share


Simon H's avatar
Shane Thomas's avatar
Marc Lambourne's avatar
3 Likes
3

Share this post

Good Areas
Good Areas
England clock runs per over on day one
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Share

Discussion about this post

User's avatar
How two new balls changed ODI cricket
In October 2011, cricket changed how many new balls it uses in ODI cricket. So we looked into what actually changed.
Sep 14, 2023 â€¢ 
Jarrod Kimber
7

Share this post

Good Areas
Good Areas
How two new balls changed ODI cricket
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Virat Kohli was flawless
Batsmen make errors, but for this knock, Kohli was at war with mistakes.
Feb 9, 2021 â€¢ 
Jarrod Kimber
15

Share this post

Good Areas
Good Areas
Virat Kohli was flawless
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
6
The bias against spinning pitches
A look at many of the reasons that we react as we do when a pitch spins on day one.
Feb 14, 2021 â€¢ 
Jarrod Kimber
21

Share this post

Good Areas
Good Areas
The bias against spinning pitches
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
16

Ready for more?

© 2025 Jarrod Kimber
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Create your profile

User's avatar

Only paid subscribers can comment on this post

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

Check your email

For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.

Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.