I think there is a fundamental problem with how people see players like Pujara, and by that I mean, if you aren't virtually flawless, you're shit. It's why so many good players are dripped., if you can average 45 in Test cricket, chances are you are struggling away from home, against spin, or something else. If you didn't have those weaknesses, your Smith.
I think there is a fundamental problem with how people see players like Pujara, and by that I mean, if you aren't virtually flawless, you're shit. It's why so many good players are dripped., if you can average 45 in Test cricket, chances are you are struggling away from home, against spin, or something else. If you didn't have those weaknesses, your Smith.
I think there is a fundamental problem with how people see players like Pujara, and by that I mean, if you aren't virtually flawless, you're shit. It's why so many good players are dripped., if you can average 45 in Test cricket, chances are you are struggling away from home, against spin, or something else. If you didn't have those weaknesses, your Smith.
I agree a 100%. And sadly, those people will not change their perspective or opinion, be it commentators and pundits or just fans.
The only solace we have is writers like you, whose opinion are unbiased and aren't based on populist behaviour. So Kudos to you (and others).